Act13.net

EUCHRE 13

Judge Adversity Media
JAM
2

All wet Hang em
Out 2 Dry

Who Said That!!!
Butter Cup    Butter Flies
Minny Fats
???
Dry Up Eh
DUE
DTS
DUE DUE
Right And Wrong
RAW
DOO DOO
DTS
Drain The Swamp

A funny thing happened when this little Piggy
went to the bank
code 5-13
SHOW
See How Occult Works

LEE
Lunar Entanglement Estrangement

Duality Duelity
DTS

Burning Of Books
Bob’s
Your
Carb-UN-cle
Sam

Double Voila
We are aware who killed JFK
BC
Bias Con-UN-drum
This one is selling
Christianity

Ya don’t get filthy rich by being filthy clean eh!!

Duality Duelity

Explanation of 1st Year of Trump
12/26/16
NEW Moon in Capricorn Dec 29 & New Year Astrology Numerology Forecast: Transparency & Truth
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euPxRIhRDVs>
Pluto Is Helping

State Church Insidious Elite Nuance Cause Effect
SCIENCE
Short Circuit Inherent Electromagnetic Neurology Consciousness Espy

PRICK mi FIBIB

Serpent Induced Neurosis

Political Religious Illusion Charlatan Kayfabe
media inciting
Fickle Inherent Bias Ignorant Bliss

ANG(st)

“Thy Kingdom Come”

11/5/13
Fake Moon landings – Moon landing hoax – Apollo astronauts staging moon orbit
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCHG6uJH5L8>

8/13/17
JIM FETZER ‘THE REAL DEAL” Moon Landing Hoax with Dennis Camino <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MPecnHgjUs>

11/19/17
Analysing The Astronauts Parts 1 To 3 HD
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oq0fCl-EgZ4>

11/6/16
Flat Earth – REAL OR FAKE *MUST SEE*
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HThEd6cqywQ>
Suspend Disbelief
There Is No
4th Wall

Suspension Of Disbelief
SOD
Green Side Up
as U will
collapse
ADLIB
Assured Demise Locked In Belief
IE
Ignorance Extraordinaire

State Church Insidious Elite Nuance Cause Effect
SCIENCE
Short Circuit Inherent Electromagnetic Neurology Consciousness Espy


Wisdom Instep Soul Essence
SOUL
Spirit Of Universal Law
God Universe
GU
Grows Up

LAVISH PT BOAT
Lucifer Aka Venus Inverted Space Hollywood
Pro-pagan-Da Torpedoed
By Observation Art Tact

Be Sure

BS
TLC
To Lovingly Connect
To Above
TA
UR
Welcome

Get Up To Speed
GUTS
KIT
Keep In Touch

Common Knowledge fundamental to Common Sense

Critical Think
CT
Censoring Tact

WACO
When All Censored Out
We’re All Gone
WAG
TD
The Dog

However
TIC
There Is Catch

Drag Net
DTS
Draining The Swamp
Right And Left Karma
Female Male
FM
Frequency Modulation
Love HZ
528
PG
Pineal Gland
3rd
I
1 law of 3

OJ TASK
Obstruct Justice Truth  And Source Kill
IE
2A
As Above
Eh Eh
!!
AD
AC
DC
Divide Conquer

In
God And Guv
GAG
Order

Great Divide
99-1
GO
Gulp One
Arrest Repo Triage
HOE
Heaven On Earth
100%

DTS
Chomsky
above
SAT
Space And Time
Chomsky will Not B knocked out Eh
in
Red Chair
RC
arsy

OMEN
Old Money Evolves Nefariously
Old serpents never die they just shed their skins and Fly
As We Die
AWD
IV
4

WOES
Wars Of Elite Subterfuge

PS
Power Struggle

Hillary And Trump
HAT
trick
Black Ops BOOB Obama Back

TITS
That Is To Say

What did Oedipus Say

Opus Dei
III

Germanic law was overwhelmingly concerned with the protection of individuals
and less concerned with protecting the interests of the state.
According to Michel Rouche, “Frankish judges devoted as much care to a case involving the theft of a dog

Facts must have root 2 take root God Coherency “Catch 22” must have semblance 2 catch doG chase tail

Mongrel 1

 as Roman judges
did to cases involving the fiscal responsibility of curiales, or municipal councilors”.[47]
Richard A Fine Example

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psalm_140 Psalm 140 is the 140th Psalm from the Book of Psalms. It describes putting one’s trust in God while threatened with evil.

Domine, clamavi. A prayer against sinful words, and deceitful flatterers. A psalm of David.

[1] I have cried to the, O Lord, hear me: hearken to my voice, when I cry to thee. [2] Let my prayer be directed as incense in thy sight; the lifting up of my hands, as evening sacrifice. [3] Set a watch, O Lord, before my mouth: and a door round about my lips. [4] Incline not my heart to evil words; to make excuses in sins. With men that work iniquity: and I will not communicate with the choicest of them. [5] The just shall correct me in mercy, and shall reprove me: but let not the oil of the sinner fatten my head. For my prayer also shall still be against the things with which they are well pleased:

[5] Let not the oil of the sinner: That is, the flattery, or deceitful praise.– Ibid.

[5] For my prayer: So far from coveting their praises, who are never well pleased but with things that are evil; I shall continually pray to be preserved from such things as they are delighted with.

[6] Their judges falling upon the rock have been swallowed up. They shall hear my words, for they have prevailed: [7] As when the thickness of the earth is broken up upon the ground: Our bones are scattered by the side of hell. [8] But o to thee, O Lord, Lord, are my eyes: in thee have I put my trust, take not away my soul. [9] Keep me from the snare, which they have laid for me, and from the stumbling blocks of them that work iniquity. [10] The wicked shall fall in his net: I am alone until I pass.

[6] Their judges: Their rulers, or chiefs, quickly vanish and perish, like ships dashed against the rocks, and swallowed up by the waves. Let them then hear my words, for they are powerful and will prevail; or, as it is in the Hebrew, for they are sweet.

[10] I am alone: Singularly protected by the Almighty, until I pass all their nets and snares.

Stop it … U R conjuring our demise!!!

 

Accountable Coherence Tacit
13
Truths Holistic Interactive Retrospect Transcendental Electromagnetism Enslavers Nemesis

Roman Economics Political Religious Elitist Suppression Suppressed
aka
Roman Enslavement Political Religious Exodus
Spirit Science

H IV E

PRICK mi FIBIB
Political Religious Illusion Charlatan Kayfabe
media inciting
Fickle Inherent Bias Ignorant Bliss

Outside Routine Box Intrinsic Truths Reverse Osmosis Psychosis

Transcendental Idealism
Transcendental idealism is a doctrine founded by German philosopher Immanuel Kant in the 18th century. Kant’s doctrine maintains that human experience of things is similar to the way they appear to us—implying a fundamentally subject-based component, rather than being an activity that directly (and therefore without any obvious causal link) comprehends the things as they are in themselves.
Contents [hide]
1 Background
2 Kant
3 Historical parallels
4 Schopenhauer
5 P. F. Strawson
6 Henry A. Allison
7 Opposing realism
8 See also
9 References
10 External links
Background[edit]
Although it influenced the course of subsequent German philosophy dramatically, exactly how to interpret this concept was a subject of some debate among 20th century philosophers. Kant first describes it in his Critique of Pure Reason, and distinguished his view from contemporary views of realism and idealism, but philosophers do not agree how sharply Kant differs from each of these positions.
Transcendental idealism is associated with formalistic idealism on the basis of passages from Kant’s Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics, although recent research has tended to dispute this identification. Transcendental idealism was also adopted as a label by the subsequent German philosophers Fichte and Schelling, Schopenhauer, and in the early 20th century by Husserl in the novel form of transcendental-phenomenological idealism.
Kant[edit]
Perhaps the best way to approach transcendental idealism is by looking at Kant’s account of how we intuit (German: anschauen) objects, and that task demands looking at his accounts of space and of time. Before Kant, some thinkers, such as Leibniz, had come to the conclusion that space and time were not things, but only the relations among things. Other thinkers, including Newton, maintained that space and time were real things or substances. Leibniz had arrived at a radically different understanding of the universe and the things found in it. According to his Monadology, all things that humans ordinarily understand as interactions between and relations among individuals (such as their relative positions in space and time) have their being in the mind of God but not in the Universe where we perceive them to be. In the view of realists, individual things interact by physical connection and the relations among things are mediated by physical processes that connect them to human brains and give humans a determinate chain of action to them and correct knowledge of them. Kant was aware of problems with both of these positions. He had been influenced by the physics of Newton and understood that there is a physical chain of interactions between things perceived and the one who perceives them. However, an important function of mind is to structure incoming data and to process it in ways that make it other than a simple mapping of outside data.[1]
If we try to keep within the framework of what can be proved by the Kantian argument, we can say that it is possible to demonstrate the empirical reality of space and time, that is to say, the objective validity of all spatial and temporal properties in mathematics and physics. But this empirical reality involves transcendental ideality; space and time are forms of human intuition, and they can only be proved valid for things as they appear to us and not for things as they are in themselves.[2]
The salient element here is that space and time, rather than being real things-in-themselves or empirically mediated appearances (German: Erscheinungen), are the very forms of intuition (German: Anschauung) by which we must perceive objects. They are hence neither to be considered properties that we may attribute to objects in perceiving them, nor substantial entities of themselves. They are in that sense subjective, yet necessary, preconditions of any given object insofar as this object is an appearance and not a thing-in-itself. Humans necessarily perceive objects as located in space and in time. This condition of experience is part of what it means for a human to cognize an object, to perceive and understand it as something both spatial and temporal: “By transcendental idealism I mean the doctrine that appearances are to be regarded as being, one and all, representations only, not things in themselves, and that time and space are therefore only sensible forms of our intuition…”[3] Kant argues for these several claims in the section of the Critique of Pure Reason entitled the “Transcendental Aesthetic”. That section is devoted to inquiry into the a priori conditions of human sensibility, i.e. the faculty by which humans intuit objects. The following section, the “Transcendental Logic”, concerns itself with the manner in which objects are thought.
Historical parallels[edit]
Xenophanes of Colophon in 530 BC anticipated Kant’s epistemology in his reflections on certainty. “And as for certain truth, no man has seen it, nor will there ever be a man who knows about the gods and about all the things I mention. For if he succeeds to the full in saying what is completely true, he himself is nevertheless unaware of it; and Opinion (seeming) is fixed by fate upon all things.”[4] Certain interpretations of some of the medieval Buddhists of India, such as Dharmakirti, may reveal them to be transcendental idealists, since they seemed to hold the position of mereological nihilism but transcendental idealists who held that their minds were distinct from the atoms. Some Buddhists often attempt to maintain that the minds are equal to the atoms of mereological nihilist reality, but Buddhists seem to have no explanation of how this is the case, and much of the literature on the aforementioned Buddhists involves straightforward discussion of atoms and minds as if they are separate. This makes their position very similar to transcendental idealism, resembling Kant’s philosophy where there are only things-in-themselves (which are very much like philosophical atoms), and phenomenal properties.
Schopenhauer[edit]
Briefly, Schopenhauer described transcendental idealism as a “distinction between the phenomenon and the thing in itself”, and a recognition that only the phenomenon is accessible to us because “we know neither ourselves nor things as they are in themselves, but merely as they appear.”[5] Some of Schopenhauer’s comments on the definition of the word “transcendental” are as follows:
Transcendental is the philosophy that makes us aware of the fact that the first and essential laws of this world that are presented to us are rooted in our brain and are therefore known a priori. It is called transcendental because it goes beyond the whole given phantasmagoria to the origin thereof. Therefore, as I have said, only the Critique of Pure Reason and generally the critical (that is to say, Kantian) philosophy are transcendental.
— Parerga and Paralipomena, Volume I, “Fragments for the History of Philosophy,” § 13
Schopenhauer contrasted Kant’s transcendental critical philosophy with Leibniz’s dogmatic philosophy.
With Kant the critical philosophy appeared as the opponent of this entire method [of dogmatic philosophy]. It makes its problem just those eternal truths (principle of contradiction, principle of sufficient reason) that serve as the foundation of every such dogmatic structure, investigates their origin, and then finds this to be in man’s head. Here they spring from the forms properly belonging to it, which it carries in itself for the purpose of perceiving and apprehending the objective world. Thus here in the brain is the quarry furnishing the material for that proud, dogmatic structure. Now because the critical philosophy, in order to reach this result, had to go beyond the eternal truths, on which all the previous dogmatism was based, so as to make these truths themselves the subject of investigation, it became transcendental philosophy. From this it follows also that the objective world as we know it does not belong to the true being of things-in-themselves, but is its mere phenomenon, conditioned by those very forms that lie a priori in the human intellect (i.e., the brain); hence the world cannot contain anything but phenomena.
— The World as Will and Representation, Vol. I, Appendix: “Criticism of the Kantian Philosophy”
P. F. Strawson[edit]
In The Bounds of Sense, P. F. Strawson suggests a reading of Kant’s first Critique that, once accepted, forces rejection of most of the original arguments, including transcendental idealism. Strawson contends that, if Kant had followed out the implications of all that he said, he would have seen that there were many self-contradictions implicit in the whole.
Strawson views the analytic argument of the transcendental deduction as the most valuable idea in the text, and regards transcendental idealism as an unavoidable error in Kant’s greatly productive system. In Strawson’s traditional reading (also favored in the work of Paul Guyer and Rae Langton), the Kantian term phenomena (literally something that can be seen from the Greek word phainomenon, “observable”) refers to the world of appearances, or the world of “things” sensed. They are tagged as “phenomena” to remind the reader that humans confuse these derivative appearances with whatever may be the forever unavailable “things in themselves” behind our perceptions. The necessary preconditions of experience, the components that humans bring to their apprehending of the world, the forms of perception such as space and time, are what make a priori judgments possible, but all of this process of comprehending what lies fundamental to human experience fails to bring anyone beyond the inherent limits of human sensibility. Kant’s system requires the existence of noumena to prevent a rejection of external reality altogether, and it is this concept (senseless objects of which we can have no real understanding) to which Strawson objects in his book.
Henry A. Allison[edit]
In Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, Henry A. Allison proposes a reading that opposes Strawson’s interpretation.[6] Allison argues that Strawson and others misrepresent Kant by emphasising what has become known as the two-worlds reading (a view developed by Paul Guyer). This—according to Allison, false—reading of Kant’s phenomena/noumena distinction suggests that phenomena and noumena are ontologically distinct from each other. It concludes on that basis that we somehow fall short of knowing the noumena due to the nature of the very means by which we comprehend them. On such a reading, Kant would himself commit the very fallacies he attributes to the transcendental realists. On Allison’s reading, Kant’s view is better characterized as a two-aspect theory, where noumena and phenomena refer to complementary ways of considering an object. It is the dialectic character of knowing, rather than epistemological insufficiency, that Kant wanted most to assert.
Opposing realism[edit]
Opposing Kantian transcendental idealism is the doctrine of philosophical realism, that is, the proposition that the world is knowable as it really is, without any consideration of the knower’s manner of knowing. This has been propounded by philosophers such as Bertrand Russell, G. E. Moore, Ralph Barton Perry, and Henry Babcock Veatch. Realism claims, contrary to idealism, that perceived objects exist in the way that they appear, in and of themselves, independent of a knowing spectator’s mind.
See also[edit]
Philosophy portal
Schopenhauer’s criticism of the Kantian philosophy
Transcendence
Critique of Pure Reason
Critique of Practical Reason
Critique of Judgment
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Gottfried Martin, Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory of Science (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1955), p. 57.
Jump up ^ Gottfried Martin, Kant’s Metaphysics and Theory of Science (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1955), p. 41.
Jump up ^ Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith (London: Macmillan, 1933), p. 345 (A 369).
Jump up ^ Kathleen Freeman, Ancilla to the Presocratic Philosophers, Xenophanes fragment 34.
Jump up ^ Parerga and Paralipomena, Vol. 2, “Sketch of a History of the Doctrine of the Ideal and the Real.”
Jump up ^ Allison, H. A., Kant’s Transcendental Idealism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983); Revised and Enlarged Edition, 2004.
External links[edit]
Wikisource has the text of the 1879 American Cyclopædia article Transcendental.
“Kant’s Transcendental Idealism”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
“Kant at the Bar: Transcendental Idealism in Daily Life”. Philosophy Now.
[show] v t e
Idealism
[show] v t e
Epistemology

PlanET X 13

5/3/14
Corporate Logos are Ancient Pagan Symbols – Do You Really Understand Who Controls The World?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUfNqr4K8Bs#t=853.747732>


Pay Attention Not Taxes
Mouse Arrow Transistor Hand
MATH
SS
Spirit Science
Natural
Humane-IT-y
VERSUS
Vibes Esoteric Religious Subterfuge Usurper Semantics
Pharisees Parasite
Fork Tongue
IDOLS
Illusion Deceivers Opulent Logistics Serpentine
RIFE
Rhetoric In Fact Elusivity
ADLIB
Assured Disaster Locked In Belief
WEASELS
Worship Evil amidst Subversives Exterminating Luciferian Self

Doublethink Schematics
DTS
Deception Tyrannical Systemic

Heads Up
Avoid the FU 2

Holism Not to be confused with -holism.
Humane-IT-y Omnipresent Law Intel Sacred Math

-holism
God proclaimed de jure Moses front
SG
Shadow Guv
administer antithesis de facto doG

OMEN
Old Money Evolves Nefariously
Old serpents never die they just shed their skins and fly
As We Die
AWD

GOI
Underground Pharisees Subterfuge
UPS

Mind Control

III
Inform Inform Inform

Not 4 Amateurs
!!!

Rape 13

Nibiru Anu Zionist Illuminati
NAZI
Pirates Of The Universe
POT U
MIC
Military Industrial Complex
AVATAR
Immaculate Con-ception
IC
U

Kymatica (An Awakening) – An Amazing Documentary


Mind Over Matter
ME
Mother Earth

SOUL
Spirit Of Universal Law

Solar Ghost 13

Of 13
One Family
“The People”

A family that works and plays together
stays together

“Choose a job you love and never work a day in your life”

How can there be Aliens in
GU
God’s Universe
!!!

Alienators Yes Eh!
AYE

Don’t let them fool you!!!
gu
game you
!!!

$
V
DC
Divided Conquered

 Common Knowledge fundamental to Common Sense
NWO
No War Order

1 for the money 2 for the show
1 law of 3
to get ready

ISOG: In Search Of God

REPRESS
aka
http://frankbible13.com
FRANK
Fiduciary Responsibly Accountable Nefarious Kink
13
Truths Holistic Interactive Retrospect Transcendental Electromagnetism Enslavers Nemesis

http://www.scribd.com/doc/53187051/To-United-Nations


What’s Going On!!!

Tweet
13
Org
a
NIZE
Re Cog

Left Right

Tweet 13 Org
(asm)
a
NISM
Nature Intent Spirit Multi-ply
www.ACT13.net
Accelerated Critical Think

  Echo 4 Birds

R U SIRIUS

 

Common Knowledge fundamental to Common Sense